3 - Assessment Framework and Data Book
| PRIORITY POPULATIONS | |||
|
These priority populations or vulnerable communities should be considered within any social impact assessment of EGMs. They should be considered when assessing whether a location is appropriate for EGMs (Location Factors, above). For various reasons, research has shown that these populations are more vulnerable to the harm the gambling can cause. |
|||
| Categories | Indicator | Data Source for Catchment Area | Evidence |
| People who are socially isolated |
A. Older people |
|
Evidence Source reference no. 51-55 |
| Socio-economic disadvantage | A. SEIFA B. Income C. Public housing tenants D. Unemployment E. Government pension or payment recipients |
|
No. 56-61 |
| Cultural background |
A. Indigenous background |
|
No. 62-66 |
| Young people and students | A. Number of young people resident (aged 12-25) B. Students C. International students |
|
No. 67-70 |
| People with co-morbidities |
A. Mental health issues, including depression and anxiety |
|
No. 71-74 |
| Lack of financial resilience | A. Housing stress B. Mortgage repayments C. Housing affordability D. Emergency financial support service usage E. Medicare bulk billing |
|
No. 75-82 |
| People with cognitive impairment |
A. People with cognitive impairment, including intellectual disabilities and acquired brain injury |
|
No. 83 |
| Problem gamblers | A. Problem gambling prevalence |
|
Evidence Source reference no. 51-55 No. 56-61 No. 62-66 No. 67-70 No. 71-74 No. 75-82 No. 83 No. 84-87 |









